The skill / will matrix is a simple tool used to asses an individual’s performance and determine how best to manage them. Individuals with high skill and will should be delegated to. Those with high skill but low will should be excited, those with low skill but high will should be guided and those with low skill and low will should be directed.Summary by The World of Work Project
The Skill / Will Matrix
The skill / will matrix is a 2×2 matrix that is often used by managers to assess individual performance. The matrix places “will” (willingness, enthusiasm and self-drive) on the vertical matrix and “skill” (core capability) on the horizontal. The model suggests that individuals in each quadrant should be managed in a different, specific way, ranging from Delegation to Direction.
Leaders or managers assess the individuals in their teams against the two dimensions of skill and will. Once they’ve done this, they place the individuals in their teams into whichever quadrant is most appropriate for them, before planning how to manage them going forward.
High skill and high will
Individuals with both high levels of skill and high levels of will should be able to motivate and drive themselves, and have the ability to deliver effectively without management intervention.
These are great people to have in your team and your role as a manager is to get out of their way, let them perform, recognize their achievements and support them as required, perhaps as a coach or mentor.
High skill but low will
Individuals with high levels of skill but low levels of will have the ability to go a great job, they just lack the drive or motivation to do so consistently.
Your role as a manager with these individuals is to help motivate them, to excite them about the tasks at hand. You can read more about motivation to help you do this.
High will but low skill
Individuals with high levels of will but low levels of skill are enthusiastic and want to do a good job. They’ll put lots of effort in and do so with energy, but they lack the ability to go a really good job.
Individuals like this should be supported and guided so that they improve their level of skill. They want to learn and develop and should be helped to do so.
Low will and low skill
Individuals with low levels of both skill and will may be in the wrong role. Managers and leaders should really focus on helping these individuals increase their skill and will, or perhaps more helpfully help them find a role they truly want.
While these individuals are in a team, managers often have to pay fairly close attention to them and adopt a directive and close review style of leadership.
Each of the different skill and will quadrants requires a different, appropriate style of management. These styles of management range from direction to the least skillful and willing individuals, up to delegation for the most skillful and willing individuals.
Delegate (high skill and high will)
To delegate effectively, ensure you are clear on desired outcomes, listen effectively, involve the individual in the decision making process, provide feedback, celebrate successes and fully empower the individual to own their deliverables.
Excite (high skill and low will)
To excite effectively you need to instill a sense of value and importance into the tasks that you’re asking people to do. You also need to learn what motivates your individual and provide those motivating factors, provide feedback, celebrate successes and again fully empower the individual to own their deliverables. Individuals without ownership often lose will.
Guide (low skill and high will)
To guide effectively, set clear and agreed outcomes, explain processes and required steps, be clear regarding required quality levels, identify and provide the required training needs, observe delivery and provide frequent feedback, check in frequently, remain available to support and ensure you celebrate successes and progress in both delivery and increasing skill.
Direct (low skill an low will)
To direct effectively, try to understand what would motivate the individual and provide that, ensure you are clear about required outcomes and quality levels, set clear rules and deadlines, allow the individual to own specific bits you think they can deliver, check in with them regularly, review their work to ensure it’s at the right standard, and remember to recognize and celebrate their successes too.
The World of Work Project View
We think this model is a decent framework that helps managers think about the people in their team in a slightly different way. It also helps them think about how they can adopt their leadership style to reflect the different situations they will face with their employees. Though we think it’s useful, we think it’s only good as a starting point.
The bit we don’t like about the model is that we think it’s a bit too simplistic. It considers the individuals without really taking into consideration the broader context in which they are working. We would recommend that manager, once comfortable with this model, consider something like Blumberg’s performance model that brings “opportunity” in as a third dimension.
While this model is helpful in that it provides guidance to managers about how to respond to individuals in different situations, it doesn’t provide guidance on how to change the situation, which is often the root cause of lack of both skill and will. A great example of a change of this nature would include changing an individual’s opportunity levels.
In short, it’s good to know and understand this model, but we think there are better ones out there.
Sources and further reading
Where possible we always recommend that people read up on the original sources of information and ideas.
This post is based on various interpretations of content originally derived from the four basic leadership styles originally created by Ken Blanchard and published in his book: “The One Minute Manager“.
If you see any errors on this page or have any feedback, please contact us.