Employee Engagement describes the relationship that employees have with their work and the organizations they work for. Engaged employees are enthusiastic and positive about their work, disengaged employees are not.
Summary by The World of Work Project
Employee Engagement
Organizations have for many years been interested in understanding employee engagement in the world of work.
Over the years organizations have focused on morale, job satisfaction, employee satisfaction and employee sentiment. They current focus is Employee Engagement, but the underlying purpose remains the same.
Organizations mainly use employee surveys to try and understand how their employees feel about the work experience. Unsurprisingly, “employee experience” is a big driver of employee engagement.
The reason that employee engagement in the world of work is considered to be so important is that there is a belief that the more positively employees feel about their work and their organizations, the more productive they will be and the more they will contribute.
As a result, organizations are always seeking to measure and then improve their employee engagement. They do this primarily with a view to improving their organizational performance. The route to improvement is usually through a series of organizational development programs. Unfortunately, some organizations simply pretend to be better and more engaging workplaces than they really are. They usually do this through a process of organizational culture washing.
Societal Employee Engagement
It’s not only organizations who seek to measure employee engagement in the world of work. Polling bodies and government organizations also seek to understand employee engagement as national and sector levels as well. Some of the findings of these organizations have made interesting reading over the past decade. Many of them have been used to explain specific narratives about our relationships with work and the future of work.
In their 2024 report (based on 2023 research), Gallup say that 15% of the global workforce is actively disengage and describes this cohort as workers who actively oppose their organizations goals. In total they find that only 18% of non-managers are engaged and only 30% of managers are endaged. They go on to estimate that low employee engagement costs the global economy US$8.9 trillion, or 9% of global GDP.
Anyway, you get the point. Many people are working at a national level to assess employee engagement and to link it to lost income (or output) through the assumption that it correlates with productivity. As a result of all this narrative and calculation, the world is full of people looking to help improve engagement and thus productivity.
The World of Work Project View
We think that understanding the relationships that employees have with their organizations and their work is a very good thing to do, despite the sort of tongue-in-cheek nature of this post. We also genuinely believe that the more engaged employees are, the more productive they will be. And furthermore, we fully believe that engaged employees don’t just benefit their employers, they also have better qualities of life and benefit wider society.
However, despite these beliefs we are slightly tongue-in-cheek about this subject. And the reason is that we think that intention matters. When organizations set out to improve employee engagement so that they can profit from it, it yields different results to when they set out to improve employee experience for the sake of improving the quality of existence for their employees.
Perhaps, fundamentally, we think that there is a fair bit of hypocrisy in this space. Most people, and most large organizations, know how to create engaging working environments and cultures for their teams. The challenge though is doing so in a cost-efficient way that provides strong returns to shareholders. And, often, it is the shareholders (or whoever controls capital) who win these battles, not the employees. As ever, a lot of work in the organizational psychology and engagement space boils down to efforts to get employees to work harder for less reward. And this is perhaps a bit jading.
In no way are we trying to say that employee engagement isn’t a good thing to improve. We’re simply saying that if organizations genuinely want to improve engagement, they can do so. However to do so they need to be genuine in their intentions to do so, and to stop giving with one hand and taking away with the other.
How We Help Organizations
We provide leadership development programmes and consulting services to clients around the world to help them become high performing organizations that are great places to work. We receive great feedback, build meaningful and lasting relationships and provide reduced cost services where price is a barrier.
Learning more about who we are and what we do it easy: To hear from us, please join our mailing list. To ask about how we can help you or your organization, please contact us. To explore topics we care about, listen to our podcast. To attend a free seminar, please check out our eventbrite page.
We’re also considering creating a community for people interested in improving the world of work. If you’d like to be part of it, please contact us.
Sources and Feedback
There, as ever, is a lot of original work behind the concepts of employee engagement. This post, though, is based on our own experiences, conversations and general reading, so there is no source reference for it.
We’re a small organization who know we make mistakes and want to improve them. Please contact us with any feedback you have on this post. We’ll usually reply within 72 hours.
