Type A & B personalities refers to a somewhat discredited theory that people fall into two categories. These are Type A (competitive, impatient, ambitious) and Type B (relaxed, less frantic and calmer). The theory says that that Type A people have worse heart health.

Summary by The World of Work Project


Type A and Type B Personalities

These Type A people are always in a rush…

The phrase “type A” personality entered the common lexicon many years ago. You’ll still regularly hear the phrase used to refer to “go-getters” or active and driven individuals.

While, of course, the world does have active, driven and motivated individuals, the actual concept of Type A and Type B personalities as defined in the original work on this concept is fairly flawed.

The Research

The concept of Type A and Type B personalities is based on research undertaken by two cardiologists, Friedman and Rosenman. As their profession suggests, they were looking into heart health.

In their work they identified a relationship between personality types and risk of heart disease and high blood pressure. Over time, the team identified that people who are generally more wound up (Type A) have worse heart health that people who are generally more relaxed (Type B).  In their work they sought to provide more details around they characteristics of these Type A and Type B personalities.

Want to be a better manager?

 Consider our Connected Management development programme. Every year we run an open cohort of our Connected Management programme for those working in small organisations or organisations that are not able to funder development. The programme is £1100 per person with discounts of up to 40% for self-funders and non-profits.

 

In 2024, we have a cohort on Wednesday 3.30pm UK time and Thursdays 9am UK time from April 17/18. It comprises 10 online live workshops with two great facilitators and access to a bank of support materials. Learn more about the programme by clicking below.

Type A Personalities

Type A personalities are generally more highly-strung than type B. They tend to be competitive, self-critical, intense and likely to overact. They’re always in a rush and can be impatient or frustrated by inefficiency. They try and make the most of their time and may try to multi-task.

They often work very hard, but generate little joy from their accomplishments. They’re also more likely to become angry than type B personalities. They may see the worst in others and may take part in physical or verbal aggression and bullying.

Type A people might get angry and point at you.

Type B Personalities

In this model, Type B personalities are calmer and more relaxed than their type A counterparts. They come across as less in a constant rush to get things done and often have less an a sense of need to compete, perform well, achieve highly or complete many things.

They’re patient, measured, more tolerant and more likely to spend their time relaxing or helping  others. They generally see the good side of events and people. It’s said they seldom become frustrated or angry with others, and are almost never instigators or either physical of verbal aggression.

Learning More

You might want to learn more about personality tests, an area we’re not experts in. You can read our posts on Discovery Insights, Merrill-Reid, Birkman and the Big Five as a starter.

Please consider our posts on these topics just a starting point from which to further your reading and understanding. As a starting point to explore more widely, we recommend looking at The Open Source Psychometrics Project.

On a side note, you might enjoy reading about the dark triad of personality types as well.

The World of Work Project View

The phrases Type A and Type B are used fairly commonly. There’s nothing really wrong with these labels being used as a shorthand way to describe people. That said, there’s nothing really scientific about it either. Like many personality categorizations, they’re not based on much evidence.

Smoking Kills

In relation to the original research as carried out in relation to heart health, things are even more dubious. This research is somewhat discredited with claims that tobacco funding supported it in an effort to find non smoking related causes for poor coronary health.

There remains a scientific view that anger and aggression are causally correlated to increased risks of poor heart health, but a there seems to be little consensus regarding the other aspects detailed in this model.

In our view, there is no real reason to consider this model in the workplace. Where personality tests are desired, we think the “Big 5” is the best one to adopt.

Our Podcast

Our Podcast is a great way to learn more about hundreds of fascinating topics from around the world of work.

This post is based on original work by Friedman and Rosenman. You can read more in their 1976 article: “Multivariate prediction of coronary heart disease during 8.5 year follow-up in the western collaborative group study”.

We’re a small organization who know we make mistakes and want to improve them. Please contact us with any feedback you have on this post. We’ll usually reply within 72 hours.